Skip to content Skip to left sidebar Skip to right sidebar Skip to footer

Let’s see what happens now ‘after the election’

At this writing, we are waiting for one of the most significant times ever in our history — “after the election.”
Yes, for months news reports tell us many things may or will occur “after the election.” Due to publication requirements, this column was written before we knew the outcome of the election, but the greatness or folly of these plans will begin to be revealed “after the election.”   
Immigration reform has been on and off again for months. Unwilling to take a vote prior to the election, the Senate tabled immigration until after the election. 
The president, with his pen and phone in hand, announced he would write an Executive Order and fix the problem, then he delayed that action until after the election. Several reports indicate he will, once again, sidestep Congress and announce his own immigration policy, after the election.  
There are an estimated 20,000 jobs waiting to be created and filled that can provide a huge economic boost to several states, and the country as a whole.
One signature would make this possible; the president’s approval of the Keystone pipeline. Governors, representatives, senators, all agree this needs to be done. Environmental studies validate this is safe. However, the decision has been slow-walked for months and now will be made after the election.  
EPA reportedly has hundreds of regulations which will go into effect after the election. They are expected to include regulating ponds and semi-dry streams and, tighter restrictions on coal, and efforts to limit fracking ­— the technology that is revolutionizing energy, putting the U.S. on track to energy independence.
The start date for Obamacare open-enrollment period and revelation of its new rates were pushed back from Oct. 15 to Nov. 15, after the election. Rates in general are expected to increase, some as much as 78 percent. This increase will be masked by higher subsidies paid by taxpayers, after the election.
Calls for a travel ban from Ebola-stricken nations, believed by many to help prevent an Ebola outbreak in the U.S., have been rejected by the administration because we are told stopping these people from entering the U.S. “would not stop the spread of Ebola, but expand it.” Many in the medical field hope this is corrected after the election.  
ISIS has matured to “Varsity” status, unraveling the advances for which our military so bravely fought and won. Air campaigns and air drops of arms has slowed the advance of ISIS. 
However, war-seasoned retired military personnel, along with more and more in government and active military, note that U.S. ground troops will be needed if we really want to defeat ISIS in the Mid-East. Many expect action after the election.   
I have never seen so many significant policy issues described as waiting until “after an election.”  
Are our leaders concerned because they know these decisions will go against certain special interest groups or the will of the people?   
Do they want to be comfortable in their positions before allowing us to see the impact of their plans on our lives? 
Only time will tell, after the election.